Is violence necessary to maintain or have a moral society Essay

Is violence necessary to maintain or have a honorable society - rise ExampleDiscussed in this paper are the differing standpoints with regard to the role of violence in maintaining a moral society. Violence is an immoral lick Throughout the years, scholars strugg conduct to explain the concept of morality. They tackled issues such as, good and evil, informant of sin among others in attempt to understand the complexity of morality. Pacifists view violence as an immoral act that results in further degradation of the society. Individuals with this standpoint believe in amicable resolution of conflicts whereby, opposing sides tick their differences aside and work towards reaching a compromise. The process of conflict resolution is lengthy and riddled with some barriers therefore, ensuring proper communication channels cost proves crucial in mitigating the conflict. Effective communication hinges on some(prenominal) parties listening to each others grievances without passing any judgment or exuding communicatory or non-verbal mockery. It also entails developing sensitivity to each others cultural background whereby, each troupe must make a conscious effort to avoid utilize language and actions that are automatically perceived by the other party as overt disregard for their culture. For example, throwing a shoe at person in the Arab culture symbolizes the highest level of disrespect in 2008, a journalist threw his show at the former president G.W. Bush during his visit to Iraq for conflict resolution talks. The presence of a neutral trinity party charged with the responsibility of mediating the conflict enable feuding parties to address their concerns in a rational manner. For example, feuding countries depose on peace delegates to mediate their amicable conflict resolution talks in order to keep back the onset of war, which is likely to result in civilian casualty and immense destruction of property. Pacifists encourage the manipulation of non-violen t methods, which entail preventing the infliction of injury or harming others. These methods negate the use of physical force or verbal threats by encouraging the use of peaceful methods to foster lasting, positive political and social change. Pacifists bear in mind the negative repercussions of resorting to violence such as counter-violence. The vengeful nature of majority of humans compels them to move in counter-violence aimed at retaliating against instigators of preceding violent acts. This perpetuates enmity failing to address initial problems that triggered violent outbursts. Individuals using non-violent methods have greater control over their message making these methods an effective form of protest. For example, in Mahtma Ghandi led the Non Cooperation Movement in 1920s, which entailed resignation from nominated positions in the legislative government and surrendering of titles with the sole intention of protesting heaviness by the government. The media provides a platfo rm for these protestors to express their grievances. However, dealing with the media might result in complications especially when conflicts exist between a minority group and large institutions such as the government. The latter have the situation to censure the media for example, the government might pass absurd statutes that restrict the freedom of the media. Such circumstances are responsible for triggering violent outbursts, which result in degradation of