Evil, its symbols and the environment Essay 2 Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Evil, its symbols and the environment 2 - Essay ExampleTwo rebel groups clashed against the Sudanese government because of its neglect of Darfur and its citizens, Justice and Equality exploit (JEM) (sometimes also called Liberation and Justice Movement) and Sudan Liberation Army (SLA). The Sudanese government unleashed an attack against the rebel forces and the average citizens in the city were just collateral damage. Men, women, and children of all ages were murdered on both statuss of the conflict (Reuters). though at present the atrocities in Darfur have somewhat ceased, the harrowing events that went before were enough to leave the corporation in despair and disarray. The best symbol I can associate to the conflict in Darfur is the balance. As defined in J. C. Coopers work, the balance symbolizes justice impartiality judgment mans merits and demerits weighed. The equilibrium of all opposites and complementaries(26). The warring parties think that the balance of justice and po wer are tipped against their side that is why they sacrifice countless lives to try and tip it in their favor. In thus struggle, the conjunction pays the price. gibe to Barbara Coloroso, genocide is an experience of evil which shatters human communities. In this paper, I would like to present how genocide wrecks communities by means of three different perspectives through the eyes of the Sudanese government, the eyes of the rebels, and through the eyes of the common citizen. and then I will try to draw conclusions from these differing perspectives in light of being a student of holiness and culture gleaning practical and philosophical lessons and insights from the experience of those that have witnessed and participated in the genocide at Darfur. The Perspective of the Sudanese Government Strong yet compassionate leadership is essential for a community to progress. Darfur became a dirt of Sudan in 1916 and for more than a century, everything was relatively peaceful though the re were insurgent groups that wanted to make Darfur as an independent state (OFahey). The attack of the rebel forces against the government of Sudan was not tolerated because tolerance would be seen a sign of weakness. And so the bloody war and genocide started on 2003 continuing until the present with the fighting facing pages to neighboring countries like Chad and the Central African Republic (Hentoff). The issue of trust. As the leaders of the community, it is expected that a countrys government will cherish its territory and will most likely blow out any flames of insurgency so as to unite its people and keep them safe. But communities are start and foremost built on trust. If the government doubts members of its citizenry and brands them as rebels and insurgents, then they will not be able to uphold their responsibility as protectors and mediators for peace. One of the governments responsibilities is to uphold justice unless in Darfurs case, the line between good citizens just trying to make those who are in power see that they have been neglected, and those that just want to destabilize the rule got blurred. Thus, whom will the government protect? Who can they trust? The issue of the greater good. Part of the responsibilities in leading a community is making tough and unpopular decisions. UN estimates that at least 300,000 people have died because of the atrocities in Darfur (Reuters). That is just .08% of the 37.2